Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tatiana Pieri vs Federica Urgesi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pieri vs Urgesi analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Tatiana Pieri vs Federica Urgesi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pieri 0 - 0 Urgesi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pieri has won 47.4% of points on their second serve, while Urgesi has won 41.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pieri, in recent form, has won 57.21% of their opponent's second serve points, while Urgesi has won 53.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.78% and 44.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pieri has saved 53.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Urgesi has saved 47.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pieri has won 68% of matches played (W/L 51/ 24), with Urgesi winning 39.39% (W/L 13/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pieri has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 221/ 161), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 15/ 22). Urgesi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Pieri has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68% of matches (W/L 51/ 24), where as Urgesi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pieri has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.28 while Urgesi has played against players with an average rank of 216.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pieri has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Urgesi has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pieri has converted 49.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Urgesi has converted 52.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
348
Rank
346
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
836
Rank
818
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
56% (249-194)
Career Total W/L
43% (29-39)
67% (29-14)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tatiana Pieri vs Federica Urgesi For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pieri VS Urgesi
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tatiana Pieri | Federica Urgesi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (29/14) | 47% (7/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (62/40) | 47% (17/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (528/428) | 51% (171/167) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (29/14) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 86 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:20 | 1:50:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.37 | 298 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1800/2760) | 60% (598/1005) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (1049/1800) | 60% (357/598) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (455/960) | 42% (170/407) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (204/409) | 52% (67/128) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (1388/2849) | 47% (461/980) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (29/14) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (29/43) | 47% (7/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (12/16) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (27/25) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (27/2) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 14% (7/1) |
Tatiana Pieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Maria Mateas
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
85 of
118)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
53 of
85)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Sara Cakarevic
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Tatiana Pieri
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Tatiana Pieri
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Madison Sieg
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Tatiana Pieri
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Priscilla Hon
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Jennifer Ruggeri
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tatiana Pieri
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Valeriya Strakhova
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Federica Urgesi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Fernanda Labrana
Player
Federica Urgesi
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Georgia Pedone
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Federica Urgesi
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
41%
(
21 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Haavisto
Player
Federica Urgesi
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Federica Urgesi
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Marina Melnikova
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
54%
(
52 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Duru Soke
Player
Federica Urgesi
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
36 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
103)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Verena Meliss
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Francesca Pace
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
77%
(
10 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Pieri Vs Urgesi Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Pieri are available here and Urgesi photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tatiana Pieri
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
